Model comparison
DBRX vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 35.0 to 14.9.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 37.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1322 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1324 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.1% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1309 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1305 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1100 |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1339 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1347 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1301 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1313 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 78.3% |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1307 |
| WildBench | — | 79% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.