Model comparison
DBRX vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 47.6 to 29.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 34.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DBRX leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1351 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
Reasoning DBRX leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1346 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| DTBench | — | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1351 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 82.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 64.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1340 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1293 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1345 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.