Noometry

Model comparison

Command R7B vs GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra has enough public results to be ranked (#1); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

70.8

Rank #1 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-6 Astra leads 52.9 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for GPT-6 Astra.
  • GPT-6 Astra accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R7BGPT-6 Astra
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index32.570.8
Released2024-12-022026-09-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0375$10
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$50
Results tracked156

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
DeepSWE—74.1%
FrontierCode—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1786
FrontierSWE—65.5%
SciCode—56.5%
GSO—79.4%
WeirdML—93.6%
LMArena Coding—1487
MirrorCode—46.7%
ALE-Bench—2,951

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Astra leads

Command R7B: 26.1, GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
APEX-Agents—64.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard32.1%—
Remote Labor Index—20.8%
BALROG—68.3%
GDP.pdf—34.2%
Vending-Bench 2—15,515

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-2—95%
NYT Connections (extended)—98.1%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—72%
EBR-Bench—76.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1462
Mystery Game Puzzles—84%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—64.4%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—166.45

Math Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—97.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath Erdős—2.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
GPQA Diamond—95.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—54.8%
SimpleQA Verified—75.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.7%
LMArena Expert—1483

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision—1281
Blueprint-Bench 2—49.7%
Furniture Assembly—80%
LMArena Document—1468

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Non-English—1430
LMArena Chinese—1484
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1440
LMArena Japanese—1379
LMArena Korean—1426
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1407

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Instruction Following—1450

Long Context Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Longer Query—1456

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text—1441
LMArena Creative Writing—1418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2173
LMArena Multi-Turn—1448

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R7B better than GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has enough public results to be ranked (#1); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B or GPT-6 Astra?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra lists at $10 and $50.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R7B and GPT-6 Astra share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Astra has 56.

Related comparisons

Go deeper