Model comparison

Command R7B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R7B Cohere

32.1

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

Summary

  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R7B and DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications
Command R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Noometry Index32.153.6
Released2024-12-022026-04-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output4K393K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0375$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.60
Results tracked141

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierCode—18.8%
LMArena WebDev—1581
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—63%
LMArena Coding—1457
ALE-Bench—1,306

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R7B: 25.9, DeepSeek V4 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard32.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
ARC-AGI-2—61.4%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
ARC-AGI-1—89%
CritPt—16.6%
Chess Puzzles—33%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1443
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—41.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.51

Math Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—94.4%
ProofBench—56%
LMArena Math—1427

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
GPQA Diamond—91%
SimpleQA Verified—33.6%
LMArena Expert—1441

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1467
LMArena French—1438
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1403
LMArena Korean—1383
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1437

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1421

Long Context Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1435

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R7B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Text—1432
LMArena Creative Writing—1403
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R7B better than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B or DeepSeek V4 Flash?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R7B and DeepSeek V4 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper