Model comparison
Command R+ vs Yi-1.5-34B
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 43.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1160 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1182 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Yi-1.5-34B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.