Model comparison

Command R+ vs StarCoder 2 7B

Command R+ has enough public results to be ranked (#257); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

37.0

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 7B leads 34.8 to 29.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 27.7% for StarCoder 2 7B.

Side by side

Command R+ and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Command R+StarCoder 2 7B
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index32.437.0
Released2024-08-302024-02-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 7B leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.8

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%27.7%
HumanEval+56.7%29.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index119.3493.56
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
LiveBench31.8%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
MMLU69.4%38.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
LMArena Expert1174—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Longer Query1230—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Command R+ has enough public results to be ranked (#257); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Command R+ or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and StarCoder 2 7B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper