Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

39.9

Rank #144 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 26.0 to 8.9.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index32.039.9
Released2024-08-302025-12-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.20
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.9 (#139)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Coding11871378
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 26.0 (#123)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts11861348
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 35.0 (#147)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Math11881369
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.6 (#145)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%9.6%
LMArena Expert11741354
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 46.0 (#158)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Non-English12161320
LMArena Chinese12261382
LMArena French12081396
LMArena German12161349
LMArena Japanese11661270
LMArena Korean11381269
LMArena Russian12271303
LMArena Spanish11891377

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 69.0 (#175)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Instruction Following11971303
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#170)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Longer Query12311300

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.5 (#169)

BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text12291348
LMArena Creative Writing12351269
LMArena Multi-Turn12131319
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper