Model comparison

Command R+ vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 35.9.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+ and Muse Spark specifications
Command R+Muse Spark
ProviderCohereMeta
Noometry Index32.050.3
Released2024-08-302026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Coding11871482
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts11861475
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28152.09
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—11.3%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Math11881455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LiveBench Math21.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Expert11741458
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English12161464
LMArena Chinese12261507
LMArena French12081497
LMArena German12161497
LMArena Korean11381457
LMArena Russian12271467
LMArena Spanish11891471
LMArena Japanese1166—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following11971443
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query12311451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark
LMArena Text12291474
LMArena Creative Writing12351460
LMArena Multi-Turn12131477
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Muse Spark share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper