Model comparison

Command R+ vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 9.2.

Side by side

Command R+ and Muse Glimmer specifications
Command R+Muse Glimmer
ProviderCohereMeta
Noometry Index32.441.7
Released2024-08-302026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Coding11871416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts11861396
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—2.6%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math11881417
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert11741386
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English12161384
LMArena Chinese12261412
LMArena Russian12271390
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following11971375
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query12301382

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text12291389
LMArena Creative Writing12351339
LMArena Multi-Turn12131399
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper