Model comparison
Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 43.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 4K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.