Model comparison
Command R+ vs Magistral Small
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Magistral Small leads 38.4 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 54.9% for Command R+ and 61.3% for Magistral Small.
- Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Command R+ leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 54.9% | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Magistral Small?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Magistral Small?
Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Magistral Small share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.