Model comparison
Command R+ vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 24.4 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1249 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1240 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1247 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1251 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Too close to call
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.