Model comparison
Command R+ vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 9.2.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1418 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1416 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1397 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1422 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.