Model comparison

Command R+ vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 9.2.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+ and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Command R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index32.446.2
Released2024-08-302026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output4K30K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.50
Results tracked3420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding11871457
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts11861448
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math11881442
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert11741445
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English12161440
LMArena Chinese12261475
LMArena French12091466
LMArena German12161456
LMArena Japanese11661405
LMArena Korean11381416
LMArena Russian12271457
LMArena Spanish11891447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following11971420
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query12301431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text12291450
LMArena Creative Writing12351436
LMArena Multi-Turn12131452
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper