Model comparison
Command R+ vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 9.2.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1457 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1448 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1442 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1445 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1452 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.