Model comparison
Command R+ vs Falcon-180B
Command R+ and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 112.13 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 70.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1013 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Falcon-180B?
Command R+ and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Falcon-180B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.