Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B

Command R+ and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B DeepSeek

32.7

Rank #252 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 24.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 48.4% for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B.

Side by side

Command R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Noometry Index32.432.7
Released2024-08-302025-01-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 36.9 (#200)

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%38.1%
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%48.4%
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 19.2 (#263)

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34135.43
SimpleBench17.4%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—50.6%
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 5—87.1%

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 24.1 (#270)

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
GPQA Diamond—44.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query1230—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B?

Command R+ and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Command R+ or DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B better for coding?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper