Model comparison
Command A vs Yi-34B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Command A | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-34B leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1112 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Yi-34B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Yi-34B leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1104 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1091 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1113 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Yi-34B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Yi-34B better for coding?
Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.