Model comparison
Command A vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Solar Pro4 leads 40.1 to 27.2.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 524K |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1437 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1427 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Command A | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1385 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.