Model comparison

Command A vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 39.4 to 27.2.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Command A and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
Command ANemotron 3 Super
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index36.540.1
Released2025-03-132026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.45
Results tracked2421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding13301403
Aider Polyglot12%—
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
ALE-Bench—213.9

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Nemotron 3 Super: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts13261386
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math13001380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert12951398
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13131355
LMArena Chinese13271432
LMArena French13511405
LMArena German13411341
LMArena Russian13141336
LMArena Spanish13471417
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following13091347

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query13341362

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13311378
LMArena Creative Writing13191317
LMArena Multi-Turn13391369
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Nemotron 3 Super share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper