Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 40.5 to 27.2.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Command ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index36.540.6
Released2025-03-132025-12-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output8K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.20
Results tracked2418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Coding13301378
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: —

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts13261348
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Math13001371

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%9.6%
LMArena Expert12951355

Multilingual Too close to call

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Non-English13131320
LMArena Chinese13271382
LMArena French13511396
LMArena German13411348
LMArena Japanese12851268
LMArena Korean12851269
LMArena Russian13141303
LMArena Spanish13471376

Instruction Following Too close to call

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Instruction Following13091304

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Longer Query13341300

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174)

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text13311348
LMArena Creative Writing13191269
LMArena Multi-Turn13391319
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper