Model comparison

Command A vs Mixtral 8x22B

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 15.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Command A and 55.1% for Mixtral 8x22B.
  • Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 64K.

Side by side

Command A and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Command AMixtral 8x22B
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index36.527.1
Released2025-03-132024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K64K
Max output8K64K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$6
Results tracked2434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Command A leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding13301166
Aider Polyglot12%—
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Mixtral 8x22B leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts13261150
DTBench61.3%55.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
LMCA10.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math13001184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert12951113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English13131128
LMArena Chinese13271116
LMArena French13511166
LMArena German13411141
LMArena Japanese12851037
LMArena Korean12851057
LMArena Russian13141158
LMArena Spanish13471151

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following13091147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query13341144

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text13311162
LMArena Creative Writing13191141
LMArena Multi-Turn13391130
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Command A scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.2 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Mixtral 8x22B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper