Model comparison
Command A vs Mistral Small
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Small in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 36.2 to 16.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 57.1% for Command A and 37.1% for Mistral Small.
- Mistral Small is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Mistral Small accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Command A | Mistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 26.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 497.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 37.1% |
Reasoning Mistral Small leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 37.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 70.9% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 20.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 44.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 53.7% |
| LiveBench | — | 44% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1341 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 39.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.8% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1291 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.5% |
| MMLU | — | 68.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1142 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1315 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1340 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1275 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1346 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.7% |
Long Context Too close to call
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1344 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 30.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Mistral Small?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Small?
Mistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Mistral Small better for coding?
Mistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Mistral Small share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.