Model comparison
Command A vs Mistral Medium 3
Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Mistral Medium 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 134.07 |
Math Not comparable
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Mistral Medium 3: 34.1
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 21.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Mistral Medium 3?
Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Medium 3?
Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A does, with 256K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Mistral Medium 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3 has 2.