Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Large 4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 27.2.
  • Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command AMistral Large 4
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index36.543.1
Released2025-03-132026-10-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output8K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.68
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.09
Results tracked2415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Coding13301475
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1541

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Mistral Large 4: —

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Hard Prompts13261444
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—27.4%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Math13001488

Knowledge Too close to call

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Expert12951447
SimpleQA Verified—20%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Non-English13131415
LMArena Chinese13271491
LMArena Russian13141414
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Instruction Following13091424

Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Longer Query13341429

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)

BenchmarkCommand AMistral Large 4
LMArena Text13311427
LMArena Creative Writing13191361
LMArena Multi-Turn13391424
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Mistral Large 4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper