Model comparison
Command A vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1390 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1395 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.