Model comparison
Command A vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 37.1 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1270 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1264 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1274 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1248 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1245 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.