Model comparison
Command A vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 47.6.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1445 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1435 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1422 |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1417 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.