Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4 leads 49.9 to 26.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 12% for Command A and 79.6% for Grok 4.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command AGrok 4
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index35.947.8
Released2025-03-132025-07-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2448

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
Aider Polyglot12%79.6%
LMArena Coding13311408
WeirdML—45.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.7 (#36), Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%63%
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%73.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts13261409
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.46
ForecastBench—60.9

Math Grok 4 leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Math13001422
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
Omni-MATH—60.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Expert12951417
GPQA Diamond—87%
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Vision—1211
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Non-English13131403
LMArena Chinese13271428
LMArena French13521418
LMArena German13411429
LMArena Japanese12831396
LMArena Korean12851376
LMArena Russian13141409
LMArena Spanish13461419

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Instruction Following13091387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Command A: 40.6 (#147), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Longer Query13341409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)

BenchmarkCommand AGrok 4
LMArena Text13311412
LMArena Creative Writing13191397
LMArena Multi-Turn13381416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
WildBench—79.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok 4 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper