Model comparison

Command A vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 15 shared benchmarks.

Command A

Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

49.2

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and GPT-6 Sol in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Sol leads 59.6 to 26.8.
GPT-6 Sol is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and GPT-6 Sol specifications
	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
Provider	Cohere	OpenAI
Noometry Index	35.9	49.2
Released	2025-03-13	2026-09-22
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	256K	1.05M
Max output	8K	128K
Input $ / M tokens	$2.50	$2
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$10
Results tracked	24	22

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Coding	1331	1453
DeepSWE	—	68.8%
FrontierCode	—	49.3%
Aider Polyglot	12%	—
LMArena WebDev	—	1692

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.7 (#36), GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	57.1%	—
GDP.pdf	—	28%

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts	1326	1420
Kagi LLM Benchmark	28.8%	—
NYT Connections (extended)	—	90.1%
EBR-Bench	—	53.3%
DTBench	61.3%	—
LMCA	10.3%	—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Math	1300	1404

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	6.5%
LMArena Expert	1295	1449

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
Furniture Assembly	—	58.3%

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English	1313	1389
LMArena Chinese	1327	1416
LMArena Russian	1314	1407
LMArena Spanish	1346	1377
LMArena French	1352	—
LMArena German	1341	—
LMArena Japanese	1283	—
LMArena Korean	1285	—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following	1309	1406

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 40.6 (#147), GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query	1334	1415

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text	1331	1396
LMArena Creative Writing	1319	1392
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1145	2125
LMArena Multi-Turn	1338	1405

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and GPT-6 Sol share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.