Model comparison
Command A vs Falcon-180B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 25.2.
Side by side
| Command A | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1007 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1013 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Falcon-180B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.