Model comparison

Command A vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A

Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

Seed 2.0 Pro

ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

Summary

They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 42.9 to 26.8.
Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and Seed 2.0 Pro specifications
	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
Provider	Cohere	ByteDance Seed
Noometry Index	35.9	42.5
Released	2025-03-13	2026-02-14
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	256K	256K
Max output	8K	128K
Input $ / M tokens	$2.50	$0.50
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$3
Results tracked	24	20

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Coding	1331	1472
Aider Polyglot	12%	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.7 (#36), Seed 2.0 Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	57.1%	—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts	1326	1453
Kagi LLM Benchmark	28.8%	—
NYT Connections (extended)	—	28.4%
Thematic Generalization	—	57.1%
DTBench	61.3%	—
LMCA	10.3%	—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Math	1300	1440

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Expert	1295	1440
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision	—	1275

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English	1313	1442
LMArena Chinese	1327	1490
LMArena French	1352	1470
LMArena German	1341	1443
LMArena Japanese	1283	1408
LMArena Korean	1285	1412
LMArena Russian	1314	1450
LMArena Spanish	1346	1460

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following	1309	1414

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 40.6 (#147), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query	1334	1428

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text	1331	1448
LMArena Creative Writing	1319	1406
LMArena Multi-Turn	1338	1441
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1145	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 256K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.