Model comparison

Command A vs DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)

Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 26.8.

Side by side

Command A and DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) specifications
Command ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Noometry Index35.939.7
Released2025-03-132024-05-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
Aider Polyglot12%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—48.9%
LMArena Coding1331—
BigCodeBench Complete—59.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.7 (#36), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Command A: 17.7 (#276), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1326—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—78.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—124.78
HellaSwag—87.1%
PIQA—83.9%
WinoGrande—86.3%

Math Not comparable

Command A: 33.5 (#172), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
LMArena Math1300—

Knowledge Not comparable

Command A: 36.5 (#157), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
LMArena Expert1295—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—92.2%
MMLU—78.4%
TriviaQA—80%

Multilingual Not comparable

Command A: 45.5 (#166), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
LMArena Non-English1313—
LMArena Chinese1327—
LMArena French1352—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1283—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Russian1314—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command A: 69.3 (#172), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following1309—

Long Context Not comparable

Command A: 40.6 (#147), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
LMArena Longer Query1334—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command A: 47.8 (#204), DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
LMArena Text1331—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
LMArena Multi-Turn1338—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)?

Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Command A or DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper