Model comparison
Codestral vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
StepFunSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3 leads 39.5 to 26.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 32.5% for Codestral and 62.3% for Step 3.
Side by side
| Codestral | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | 62.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Step 3 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.