Model comparison

Codestral vs Mistral Small 3.1

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 38.3 to 27.3.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper at $0.35 / $0.56 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
  • Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
CodestralMistral Small 3.1
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index30.631.7
Released2024-05-292025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K128K
Max output8K102K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.56
Results tracked728

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%—
LMArena Coding—1309
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1278
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%
LMArena Math—1262

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
LMArena Expert—1257

Multimodal Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English—1255
LMArena Chinese—1253
LMArena French—1273
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
IFEval—75%
LMArena Instruction Following—1264

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query—1299

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text—1277
LMArena Creative Writing—1253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1270

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

Is Codestral or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper