Model comparison
Codestral vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 37.1 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.