Model comparison
Codestral vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 37.6 to 26.9.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1269 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1250 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1250 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1253 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.