Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Ring-2.6-1T
Codellama 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 36.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Codellama 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.