Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.8 to 33.4.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 46.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.99 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.8 27B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1593 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1482 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 47.5% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 27B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1460 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 42.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1456 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1482 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1271 |
Multilingual Qwen3.8 27B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1504 |
| LMArena French | — | 1465 |
| LMArena German | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1439 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1450 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?
Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.8 27B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.