Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 64.0 to 33.6.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Codellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.351.1
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked729

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1472
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts10521457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.27

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1476

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English9921436
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1444
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following10241437

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text10571447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper