Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Codellama 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Codellama 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.