Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 33.4 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 976 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.