Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 34.8 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1208 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.