Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where o1 leads 48.6 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | 89% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1348 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1369 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and o1 share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.