Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 44.0 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Codellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index33.740.0
Released—2026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1375
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts10521337

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert—1356

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English9921295
LMArena Chinese—1359
LMArena French—1366
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1238
LMArena Russian—1253
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following10241318

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query—1314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text10571327
LMArena Creative Writing—1254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280
LMArena Multi-Turn—1328

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper