Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 33.4.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1445 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.