Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 90B
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSide by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.