Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.5-Air in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 49.1 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index33.738.9
Released—2025-07-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
GSO—2.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1397
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Hard Prompts10521379
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43%
ForecastBench—59.2

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
Omni-MATH—39.1%
LMArena Math—1396

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
LMArena Expert—1370

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English9921366
LMArena Chinese—1426
LMArena French—1399
LMArena German—1377
LMArena Japanese—1348
LMArena Korean—1308
LMArena Russian—1373
LMArena Spanish—1386

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following10241354
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query—1366

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text10571384
LMArena Creative Writing—1343
WildBench—78.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1371

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.5-Air share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper