Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 3 4B

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.5 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 4B specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
ProviderMetaGoogle
Noometry Index33.728.1
Released—2025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1230
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—19.6%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Hard Prompts10521253
Kagi LLM Benchmark—25.2%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—2.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.02

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.5%
LMArena Math—1239

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
GPQA Diamond—23.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.4%
LMArena Expert—1223

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Non-English9921273
LMArena German—1281
LMArena Russian—1294

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Instruction Following10241239

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Longer Query—1273

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Text10571291
LMArena Creative Writing—1271
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1068
LMArena Multi-Turn—1255

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 3 4B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 4B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper