Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 49.3 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1373 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1377 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| DTBench | — | 62.8% |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1373 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1373 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1404 |
| LMArena French | — | 1388 |
| LMArena German | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1367 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1373 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1367 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1366 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.