Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Flash in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 20.1.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications
Codellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Noometry Index33.753.6
Released—2026-04-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierCode—18.8%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—63%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1457
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—1,306
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10521444
ARC-AGI-2—61.4%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
ARC-AGI-1—89%
CritPt—16.6%
Chess Puzzles—33%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—41.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.49

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—94.4%
ProofBench—56%
LMArena Math—1427

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
GPQA Diamond—91%
SimpleQA Verified—33.6%
LMArena Expert—1441

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Non-English9921420
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1439
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1406
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10241421

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1434

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Text10571432
LMArena Creative Writing—1403
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and DeepSeek V4 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper